Light has been of interest to me for some time, one of those strange things that most people don’t even consider, yet drives our very existence. Through the years I’ve read many books and articles on what science thinks of the strange substance, how we think it moves, how fast it moves and so forth, yet, for all the things we know about it, there are that many more we don’t. One of its most fascinating properties to me, is the fact that it moves as a wave and a particle, or at least that is what we believe. The duplication of the experiment that proved this, is the purpose of this article.
The experiment is called the “Two Slit Experiment”, and its mentioned in many of the books I’ve read related to Quantum Physics, Physics, Light…, yet despite many hours of searching, I’ve found very little on the actual experiment itself. As a result, I’ve set out to try to duplicate the experiment and see for myself what it proves or disproves.
The Proof:
It was believed for many years that light was small packets of energy that moved in straight lines through space, bouncing off things that it hit. But there were other strange properties that were seen, and eventually Thomas Young performed a rather simple experiment where he broke a beam of light into two pieces and documented what he saw. To do this, he used a card, positioned edge wise, and shined a tight beam of sunlight across the edge. He was thinking that he’d get two seperate areas of light with a darkspot in the middle, but what he really got was much more strange. He saw a series of light and dark bands across the wall which resembled in every detail, what you’d expect to get if you crashed two waves together. The light spots being spots where the two waves enhanced each other, and the dark bands where they destroyed each other.
As the single light wave hit the edge of the card, it creates two seperate waves that continue to move towards the back wall. However, once created, they continue to spread out like a water wave would do, and begin to bump into each other on the other side of the card. These interactions cause the wave to begin cancelling and enhancing itself until it eventually runs into the back wall and is shown for what it is, A Wave!
The Setup:
I wanted to be sure that I built a device that allowed me to change different parameters of the test without having to build a bunch of different pieces. The design I ended up with consists of 4 pieces, mounted on a board which is then mounted to a tripod for easy placement. The 4 pieces are designed to allow me to change the center divider thickness so that I could test different variations. Once the divider is in place, the other two pieces are opened in order to create the slit openings. So with this basic setup, I can change the slit width as well as the slit openings themselves.
I then purchased a lazer pointer to use as my light source because its necessary to use a light source that is steady. Otherwise, it would cancel itself out due to the variations of light waves being sent and would never provide a good test subject. Perhaps its what my problem is and I”m looking into it, but for now I have to assume the $60 I spent on the pointer was worth it. I purchased a little nicer pointer to be sure it was steady.
Results:
I started the test out by leveling and aligning all the pieces. I wanted to start out producing the lines and then work through the math to see if I could determine the wavelength of light I was using (which of course I already know). But no matter how many times I redid the math or changed the position of the elements, I couldn’t get anything close to what I expected. During the process of moving things around, I removed the divider to try a new one, but when I removed it, I noticed that I still had an interference pattern on the wall. This shouldn’t be possible! I should only see the pattern if I’m breaking up the light, but I’m seeing a clear, absolute pattern, just by breaking up the beam. Not by splitting it, just by interferring with it.
I’ve done the test over and over and get the same results. I’ve tried narrower pieces of material to see if the pattern changed due to the thickness, but nothing changed. The closer I put the two walls, the wider the pattern on the wall, but its there and its very steady. So now you are probably wondering like me, what gives? Well, at this point I can’t offer a solution to that question, but am still experimenting to see if I can figure it out. I’ve also been in contact with the local high school to see if I can figure out how they do these experiments, but so far its been a complete dead end.
I’ll post new material when I get more information on what is going on. At this point, I can only assume I’m doing something wrong, but will keep looking until I determine what is happening.
Here is the result with the dual slit in place:
And finally, the result with only a single slit in place:
–glenn hancock
I know, there are literally thousands of websites that make one claim or another about why its illegal for the United States Government to charge taxes on a citizens wages, and I’m not going to get into which are right or wrong. One of the problems with people’s positions are that they take up too many. There is but a single example of why these taxes are illegal and it’s in such a simple form that not even a judge or attorney can wiggle his way out of it.
Fact 1: In The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the government is required to have an OMB Number assigned to each document in which a citizen is required to supply specific information. A document not containing this official number is NOT a required legal document and a citizen only needs to quote this law to have the requirement thrown out of any court.
Fact 2: OMB Numbers expire in either 1 or 3 years depending on the document needs. Afterwards, the document must be sent back through the review process and receive a new number.
Fact 3: There are 3 forms for receiving OMB Numbers. The Form 83-I Paperwork Reduction Act Submission is a form used to submit a future OMB candidate but does not list any of the Regulations or laws referencing the requirements. Form 83 Request for OMB Review, is the official document that places the forms requiring OMB approval into review. This document must list the appropriate laws and requirements for the forms so that they can be researched by the appropriate departments to make sure the questions and requirements are met by law. Form 83-C allows a previously approved form to be modified and puts in for what was changed and why, in order to get it approved.
Fact 4: The 1040 Personal Income return that we all fill out has had the same OMB number for over 23 years. A Form 83-I is filled out every year requesting a 3 year extension on the form, despite the fact that NO tax return is ever used more than 1 year. NO Form 83-C has ever been filled out for it despite the fact that EVERY year things are changed on the form.
Fact 5: Starting in 2005, the IRS has started using that same OMB Number on a multitude of other forms. Despite the fact that they all had their own numbers in previous years. Don’t get me wrong here, the other forms were all illegal as well due to the fact that they’d all had their numbers in most cases for over 20 years as well, but they at least did have different numbers.
So what does all this mean? Well, it appears that the #1 form used by most United States CITIZENS is not an officially approved document and therefore is not a required document for a citizen to fill out. If this is the case, and it is, then we should all call the IRS and ask them for the approved document for us to file our taxes this year. Of course, they won’t provide one, because its physically impossible (without corruption) for them to receive a number, because they CAN NOT list the regulations forcing the requirement on a citizen.
Before anyone raises too much of a fuss though I have a couple questions to ask that I doubt many of you realize.
Your 4th amendment right states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Therefore, unless our government is accusing all citizens of some crime and have court orders, we are protected with our papers. They cannot pass a law requiring us to give up personal information without directly opposing this amendment. It’s therefore impossible for anyone to ever pass a law stating directly that a citizen has to give up his papers for purposes of paying a tax. So, how can you have a right to protection, but the IRS have the right to ignore it? Our system of government does not work that way unless everyone turns their heads and ignores it!
Without going into great detail, your 5th amendment right contains the following words: “nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”.
The question is now: “Do any of you think the IRS will, and does, take your tax returns and put you in jail because you filed something incorrect? They do it everyday! This means they are doing nothing more than twisting your arm behind your back, threatening to kill you by taking your life away, unless you sign the document giving them the right to do just that later on if they want.
The IRS is able to take property, papers and such without any due process at all, and worse yet, seems to be able to FORCE a citizen to bear witness against himself by forcing him to fill out incriminating evidence. Hmm, I wonder who’s really breaking the law here?
Lastly I want to give you direct evidence that the IRS breaks the laws on a daily bases for those of you that still somehow think its all legal. I’m sure you’ve all heard of the IRS garnishing a person’s wages or bank accounts. So lets take a look at the exact code in that huge impossible book that we all must know by heart and see where it says they can do this. (Anyone wonder why we have to understand all that code but they don’t?)
Tax code: Sec 6331 is the only place in the entire manual that gives this right and its part of what they send to an employer to force the issue. However, it’s interesting that they only send section 6331 paragraph (b) to the employer. Paragraph (b) states what is required and what will happen if they don’t follow orders. Why is that pesky paragraph (a) not sent? Maybe to save paper? Or maybe to mislead?
Paragraph (a) of the tax code states that they have the right to levy accrued salary or wages of anyone owing taxes and having not paid. Or does it? Actually it states the following: “Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official of the United States…”. Looking the code section up in the regulations that are meant to better define what each code section is talking about, further states the fact that they only have the right to levy wages against an employee of the government. It says absolutely nothing about a citizen of the country. Yet, they send this to employers everyday to force them into sending hard earned money to them.
Have you ever wondered why that huge volume of tax code never just says the word citizen? It says alien all over it, but never says citizen. Everything is worded very broadly in order to confuse the issue in order to accomplish the trickery.
Lets not get too upset with only the IRS, for they could not have accomplished this on their own. The politicians, judges and the president himself are all guilty of allowing this to continue in order to put more money into their own pockets. So if you want to pay taxes, thats all fine and good, but quit taking the high horse and blaming those that don’t as being Anti-American. True Americans are supposed to think for themselves, yet somehow most do not!
Oh, and for all those other people attacking from all different fronts? Turns out they are ALL correct! There are literally hundreds of different attacks that can be placed on the issue, however, to win, you have to have an opponent worthy of an argument, and most IRS officials and definitely all their employee’s are as dumb as rocks when it comes to their own supporting laws. So until we can do something about that, we’re fighting an un-winnable battle.
Have fun and here is a link to a video that talks about all this in more detail.
Video from PenaltyProtestor.com
–glenn hancock