June 2006


After doing more tests I have concluded that I have to find a better way to break the bond in the water in order to produce hydrogen.  So far, I have determined that to generate more hydrogen, you must have more electricity.  Depending on how much Potassium Hydroxide I want to use in my solution I can push more amps through and therefore generate more hydrogen.  However, this is completely inefficient.  For this to work we have to be able to release the hydrogen with less amperages.

I have read someone stating that creating a frequency through the water at waters natural frequency will cause the hydrogen to break more easily so that is my next experiment. 

I have been studying quantum physics and the ideas it presents for a while now.  The one thing that I keep coming back to is that it can’t be that complicated.  While I’ve got a lot of ideas along this line I wanted to take a minute to detail an idea that I just had related to why light travels as a wave and as particles and why it slows down (or appears to around larger objects compared to being in a less gravitational state) in certain conditions.

The first idea is that of light as a wave and a particle concept.  I think light is nothing but a particle and the wave principle that is witnessed, while being real, is in fact nothing more than the movement through a medium just like every other wave does.  The question only becomes what the medium is.  For lack of a better word, we’ll use the centuries old idea of the aether. 

The concept is basically that there is no existence of nothing.  Something exists everywhere.  Just because you can’t see it and can’t measure it, doesn’t eliminate the possibility that it exists.

And to think you could measure it might only make sense if you could somehow remove yourself from its presence which is impossible because I think it is the substance that holds the universe together.  In the end, everything exists inside the aether.

The theory of relativity shows that to measure the aether is quite impossible because as you travel faster and faster or get in a stronger and stronger field of gravity, the things in which you use to see and measure also become effected.  That while you yourself see the 1 meter stick as still being 1 meter, someone looking at you from another point of reference might see it longer or shorter.  This doesn’t mean that you are wrong, or that they are wrong, but that you both have different views of the same situation.

So lets think about this for a second.  If the aether does exist, and light travels through it instead of traveling through nothing, how could this help explain how things shrink or stretch due to your speed or proximity to something large such as the earth.  Well, we know that light travels at a set speed no matter where we find it.  So lets think of light as moving from one particle of aether to another forever.  If we were to relax pressure on the aether and therefore allow it to exist in its natural state, then light, as well as time, would appear to move at a more rapid state, because each progression moves it farther along its way.

Now lets put pressure on it due to large objects moving through it, or speed our space ship up closer to the speed of light where we are placing pressure on the aether around the ship.  In this case the aether is more packed together and one movement of the light actually moves a shorter distance.  Therefore time, the appearance of our meter stick and everything else based on measuring, appears to be closer together or slower.  Its not that they physically are different but everything we base our lives on is the measurement of what we see.  If we exist within certain boundaries then we will always see a meter stick as being 1 meter.  If we take that same stick to another location with less compression or more compression of the aether (more gravity or less) then we will also see the stick as being the same meter in length. However, when looking at things between these two boundries (if this were possible), you would both think something was wrong with the other.

While being in the gravity of the Sun for example:  you might view things going on here on earth as rapidly firing by and visa versa.  Earthlings would see you on the Sun as poking by more slowly than they could bare to watch.  But if asked between you which was right and which was wrong, you would both respond that things were perfectly normal for you both.  Nothing seems off, because nothing is off.  Light and therefore measurement as a whole, just seem to move differently because of the proximity of the physical substance in which light passes through.

So, if you were to be on a space ship speeding along at just under the speed of light, and you turned on a flash light, would you see the light stand still, or would you see it speed away even faster?  And if it sped away, wouldn’t it exceed the speed of light and therefore prove the Theory of Relativity wrong?  Well, if you think about this for a minute, you will quickly realize that when you turn on the flash light inside the ship, you will measure its light as precisely the speed of light.  With no bearing on the speed of your space ship.  Why you ask?  Well, because as we discussed above, the aether is more compact where you exist now.  This means that everything you experience (even though you won’t be able to tell) is closer and more compact.  This includes your measurement devices.  So while the light may indeed physically be moving slower than normal when viewed from another point of reference, you will not see it.  Because it propagates from one aether particle to the next just like normal, there just happens to be more of it in less distance, but when you measure it, it will appear exactly the same as it did on earth.

–glenn hancock

This entry contains a list of videos in order of event that you can review.  I have not modified the videos so they are straight out of the camera.  I don’t really have time to edit anything and really only recorded to help me review the rates of generation side by side.

Test 1:  This test was done with straight water to see what type of reaction I’d get.

Potassium Test:  This test was done with water and potassium in order to get an idea of what could be created without the use of electricity.  The main goal here was to see how long the Potassium Hydroxide lasts in the water.

Test 2: This test was done using plain table salt added to the water.  There are those that state you can use salt water from the ocean to create the hydrogen and while this is very true, I think you will see from the video why it can’t be realistically done.

Test 3: This test was done with water and Potassium Hydroxide.  No real measurements were done as far as the actual amounts of amperage and water used. 

Test 4:  This test was done with current flowing through 2 stainless steel bolts and a better charged battery.  Earlier tests were done with a bad battery and the current didn’t stay consistant.

Test 5:  This test consists of using aluminum wire coiled and placed into water containing Potassium Hydroxide.  Different sizes and amounts of coils are added to see what difference they had with the overall reaction.

 

This blog is dedicated to the creation of a hydrogen generator.  I have read many posts on the internet about people claiming to be driving their cars with 100% hydrogen and are creating the gas as they drive down the road.  After a tremendous amount of work and study, I have concluded that the majority of these claims are completely false.  I am still studying the creation of hydrogen gas however with the hopes that I can create a device that works.

I have 20 or so different blue prints for devices that make the claim but none supply enough information to actually complete the project.  Most of the people that supposedly wrote the papers are either dead or MIA which leads to the further opinion of BS.  A few people that I’ve spoken to about projects they have that supposedly work are not forthcoming with information and make claims that they can’t do ALL the work for everyone.  This also leads to a major question mark over their claims.

One of the leading comments that I’ve read and been told that I’ve found to be in complete error, are those stating that they have devices that break apart hydrogen from pure tap water.  I’ve done experiments trying to do this and 100% of my tests have been very little hydrogen and major corrosion around the electrical components.  The fact is that water by itself doesn’t have a lot of resistance and as such, the electricity jumps directly from one post to the other without effecting much of the surrounding water. As such the production of hydrogen is limited to the initial points of contact and nothing more.

Adding something like Potassium Hydroxide to the water raises the resistance and seems to allow the electricity to flow throughout the water, causing the production of a lot more hydrogen.  The chemical added also seems to almost totally eliminate the corrosion I see with plain tap water.  However, this has its own draw backs because the amperage that you begin to pull increases with temperature and this process can get extremely hot.  I’ve had a small cap of water pulling as much as 15A after 30 minutes of running and at that rate my 14 guage wire is getting rather warm.  It also begins to melt the contacts into the PVC and I eventually loose the flow of electricity.

Since, I have created a larger device with larger contacts and heat sinks to help obsorb some of the heat.  I’ve also inserted dividers between my posts which cuts down on the required amperage.

Since I’m just starting this site and I’ve been doing experiments for some time it will take me a little while to upload my videos and other data that I’ve collected but I will try to get it up here as quickly as possible.  Having it online will also help me get opinions from others that are interested in what I’m doing so together we might come up with a solution.

One of my goals is to build a Tesla Rotary engine and see if I can make it operate off Hydrogen gas.  If so, I want to see how many horse power I can get out of it and if its possible to have it operate an electric generator that I have.  If nothing else, I should learn quite a bit on the way.  Stay tuned for more information on my projects and what I’m doing.  I’m currently getting ideas together for how I’m going to build the engine now and hope to start working on it within the next few months.

–glenn hancock

« Previous Page